A Useful Parameter for Distinguishing between Pleural Exudates and Transudates (5)

A Useful Parameter for Distinguishing between Pleural Exudates and Transudates (5)Figures 2 and 3 show the distributions of, respectively, PCHOL and P/SCHOL values in each of the patient groups. All the transudates had PCHOL values below 55 mg/dl, a threshold misclassifying 8/67 (11.9 percent) of neoplastic exudates, 4/65 (6 percent) of tuberculous exudates, and 5/56 (8.9 percent) of the miscellaneous group as transudates. A P/SCHOL threshold of 0.3 misclassifies 8/65 (12.3 percent) of transudates as exudates and 9/67 (13.4 percent) of neoplastic exudates, 3/65 (4.6 percent) of tuberculous exudates, and 2/56 (3.5 percent) of the miscellaneous exudates as transudates. Table 3 shows that PCHOL afforded the fewest errors in distinguishing transudates from exudates, 6.7 percent, a misclassification rate that was significantly different from those of PLDH (p<0.001) and P/SLDH (p<0.01) but not from those of P/SCHOL, P/SPROT, and the three criteria of Light et al used in battery.
Table 4 lists the indices characterizing the capacity of the parameters studied in this work to diagnose exudates, together with those reported by Light et al. PCHOL had a sensitivity of 91 percent, a specificity of 100 percent, a PPV of 1 (K) percent, an NPV of 79 percent, and an efficiency of 93.2 percent. These results are better than those of any other parameters studied.

Figure-2

Figure 2. Pleural fluid cholesterol levels (PCHOL) (mg/dl) in the different groups studied.

Figure-3

Figure 3. Ratios of pleural fluid cholesterol to serum cholesterol levels (P/SCHOL) in the different groups studied.

Table 3 —Number of Misclassified Pleural Effusions in Each Group for Every Parameter Studied

P/SPROT PLDH P/SLDH PCHOL P/SCHOL P/SPROT. PLDII, or P/SLDIIt
Transudates 7/65 3/65 10/65 0/65 8/65 14/65
Neoplastic 9/67 26/67 12/67 8/67 9/67 5/67
Tuberculous 3/65 13/65 3/65 4/65 3/65 2/65
Miscellaneous 8/56 22/56 14/56 5/56 2/56 .3/56
total 27/253 64/253 39/253 17/253 22/253 24/253
(10.67) (25.2%) (15.47) (6.77) (8.67) (9.47)

Table 4— Sensibility, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and Efficiency for Every Parameter Studied

lest Sensitivity, 7 Specificity, 7 PPV 7 NPV, 7 Efficiency, 7
P/S PRO ! 89 (90) i’ 89 (98) 96 (99) 74 (98) 89.3
PLDH 67 (70) 95 (100) 97 (1(H)) .50 (61) 74.7
P/SLDH 84.6 (86) 84.6 (98) 94 (99) 65 (77) 84.5
PCHOL 91 1(H) 1(H) 79 93.2
P/SCHOL 92.5 87.6 95 80 91.3
P/SPROT, PLDH, or P/SLDIIt 94.6 (99) 78.4 (98) 92 (99) 83 (98) 90.5